Defensa y aeronáutica

This page is also available in

Displaying 11 - 20 of 20

Pages

Aprobados on 31/05/2017
Referencia: 
CCMI/149-EESC-2017

President Juncker stressed in his 2016 State of the Union Speech the need for a Europe that protects, empowers and defends. Taking greater responsibility for their security means that Europeans must invest in the development of key defence capabilities to be able to deter, respond and protect themselves against external threats. The European Union must demonstrate that it can act as a provider of hard as well as soft security, addressing calls for greater solidarity in security and defence. The Bratislava roadmap, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union have also recently underlined this priority.

Dictamen del CESE: European Defence Action Plan

Aprobados on 17/12/2009
Referencia: 
CCMI/71-EESC-2009-1944
Pleno: 
458 -
Dec 16, 2009 Dec 17, 2009

In the framework of this opinion a hearing (European Aviation Relief Programme) was organized in brussels, on 26 October 2009.
Please click on "Related sub-themes" below to see other opinions on this topic.

European aviation relief programme

Aprobados on 07/12/2017
Referencia: 
CCMI/154-EESC-2017

The European defence policy was identified as a key political priority in President Juncker's political guidelines of July 2014. This should be also viewed in connection with the fact that after decades of peace and stability, the Union is facing increased instability and new emerging security threats. This changing security environment demonstrated in a clear way that only through joint efforts in investing in security development and cooperation at all levels can we deliver on the expectations of Union citizens and our partners. For Europe to take over more responsibility for its defence, it is crucial to improve competitiveness and enhance innovation across the Union defence industry.

European Defence Industrial Development Programme

Aprobados on 07/12/2017
Referencia: 
CCMI/155-EESC-2017

Despite several initiatives over the past years, the landscape of the European defence industry is characterised by insufficient levels and quality of investment in the development and procurement of future capabilities. Member States are not cooperating enough, with more than 80% of procurement and more than 90% of Research and Technology run on a national basis. A high degree of fragmentation remains, with 178 different weapon systems in Europe compared to 30 in the US. Too little coordination in defence planning leads to an inefficient use of taxpayers' money, unnecessary duplication and suboptimal deployability of defence forces. There are wide differences in the level of defence spending between Member States. Enhanced solidarity, including through the involvement of the EU budget, is needed to deliver common defence capabilities.

Launching the European Defence Fund

Aprobados on 01/09/2003
Referencia: 
CCMI/5-EESC-2003-875

SUPPLEMENTARY OPINION of the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change on the Communication from the European Commission on European defence - Industrial and market issues: Towards an EU defence equipment policy COM(2003) 113 final

02/06/2017

EESC supports Common Internal Market of Defence Industry

It is essential for the EU to continue pursuing preventive and multilateral diplomacy, but at the same time Europe needs to strengthen its military defence capabilities in order to guarantee freedom and peace in Europe, says the EESC.

12/02/2018

All Member States, with the exception of the United Kingdom, Denmark and Malta, have decided to launch permanent structured cooperation (PESCO), pursuant to Section 2 (Articles 42 to 46) and Protocols 10 and 11 to the TEU. The will to introduce a type of differentiated integration has arisen as a political response to the demand from European citizens for greater security. It is a clear message of support for the common values of the Treaty of Rome, particularly now, at a time when the memory of the historical values of peace and cooperation that drove the peoples of the founding Member States to respond unanimously to the horrendous wounds of two world wars is fading in many Member States.

Pages