European Economic
and Social Committee
e-Procurement
Key points
The EESC:
- expresses concern about the poor results achieved on e-procurement to date;
- is concerned about the low level of Member State involvement, indicating continued resistance to adopting practices which are known to be beneficial to both public administration and economic operators;
- notes that the public procurement market is segmented: it contains multiple solutions and platforms which in most cases are not designed to be interoperable;
- calls for the solutions to be accessible to everyone, by overcoming language barriers and ensuring access for disabled people; and
- reiterates its view that European legislation on public procurement should help SMEs.
Related EESC Opinions:
- Opinion on E-invoicing in public procurement (ongoing, INT/703)
- Opinion on e-Procurement (CESE 1715/2012, INT/646)
- Opinion on electronic invoicing (CESE 1159/2011, INT/560)
- Opinion on e-procurement (CESE 1158/2011, INT/554)
- Opinions on public procurement
Downloads
-
EC presentation 17.07.2013
Recommended for you
Youth action plan in the EU external action
Opinion
Key points The EESC: While welcoming the Youth Action Plan (YAP) in EU external action, points out that there may be challenges in the roll-out and delivery, which will need monitoring…
Precarious work and mental health
Opinion
Key points The EESC: strongly believes in the evidence showing that precarious work increases the chances of workers' mental health deteriorating; acknowledges that precarious working…
Democracy at work
Opinion
Key points The EESC: supports democracy at work, as it makes companies more resilient, economically successful and better able to deliver on employment and decent work. Successful forms of…
Green collective bargaining
Opinion
Key points The EESC: asserts that businesses and workers must have proper channels for participating in efforts to support environmental protection and combat climate change; considers that…
Social Imbalances Procedure
Opinion
Key points The EESC: considers the Social Imbalance Procedure (SIP) as an opportunity to improve the coordination of national efforts to achieve upward social convergence and promote a better use…