European Economic
and Social Committee
Seed equivalence - Ukraine
Key points
- The EESC notes that certain standards are not fully aligned with EU requirements, particularly those relating to the isolation distance for certified seed for sorghum, which are lower, the varietal purity of parental lines used for the production of seeds for hybrids of maize, and the content of seeds of other species for certified seed for maize.
- The EESC agrees with the legislative proposal under examination, subject, however to first obtaining the necessary guarantees showing that the limitations indicated in the audit report have been remedied, that production standards in Ukraine now comply strictly with European requirements and that an absence of unfair competition can be guaranteed.
- Ukrainian producers have access to certain substances that are banned in the European Union. These divergences lead to a distortion of competition and would result in products which do not comply with EU health and environmental standards being able to enter the territory of the European Union.
- The most significant differences include access to active weed control substances such as atrazine (banned in the EU since 2003) or acetochlor (banned in the EU since 2012).
- With regard to pest protection, Ukrainian producers still have access to active substances in the neonicotinoid family, some of which are banned in the EU, such as clothianidin, thiamethoxam or very soon thiacloprid.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Equivalence of seeds from Moldova and from Ukraine
Opinion
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Equivalence of seeds in Bolivia
Opinion
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion on Equivalence of inspections - seed produced in Brazil and Moldova, adopted on 14 February…
Equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of seed produced in third countries
Opinion
ENEN NAT/992 – Seed equivalence (codification) Key points The EESC: has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions EESC-2018-00043-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted…
Seeds and other plant and forest reproductive material
Opinion
Key points The EESC: welcomes the legislative proposal put forward by the European Commission for the production and marketing of plant reproductive material (PRM) and forest reproductive material…
Extension of the equivalence regime for imports of forest reproductive material
Opinion
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.