European Economic
and Social Committee
Internal Security Fund
The EESC agrees with the need to allocate more resources to operational and preventive security-related actions and programmes and supports the creation of a flexible and transparent fund – distributing resources according to clear and predictable operational criteria and objectives – in order to strengthen them. The Security Fund should be designed so as to strengthen a preventive policy, which requires active engagement and cooperation with civil society, especially in terms of caring for and making arrangements for victims, auditing security actors, and preventing radicalisation. Grants from the Fund – in the case of both EU Member States and third countries – must only go to public institutions that can effectively ensure that human rights will be strictly upheld.
Key points
The EESC:
- agrees with the need to allocate more resources to operational and preventive security-related actions and programmes and supports the creation of a flexible and transparent fund – distributing resources according to clear and predictable operational criteria and objectives – in order to strengthen them;
- highlights the Security Fund should be designed so as to strengthen a preventive policy, which requires active engagement and cooperation with civil society, especially in terms of caring for and making arrangements for victims, auditing security actors, and preventing radicalisation;
- stresses that the grants from the Fund – in the case of both EU Member States and third countries – must only go to public institutions that can effectively ensure that human rights will be strictly upheld;
- stresses that it must be treated as an observer in the creation and development of this Fund so that the views of organised civil society can be heard at EU level;
- points out the need to specifically address the risk posed by the violent radicalisation of far-right groups and to counteract criminal organisations' financing mechanisms and capital flows;
- believes that it is necessary to be more than merely reactive and to deepen preventive policies, addressing both the root causes of why some people become radicalised, posing a danger to others, and the financing mechanisms of violent groups;
- stresses that human rights – the philosophical cornerstone of the EU – must be an integral element and a prerequisite of any measure taken. In the case of a financing fund, this should be made clear by refusing resources from the Fund to those who do not demonstrate compliance with the minimum standards.
Downloads
Recommended for you
EU Fund for cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:welcomes the Commission’s desire to simplify and to ensure more flexibility, but believes that the simplification provided for requires concrete guarantees in order for it to be…
Union support for Asylum, Migration and Integration; Internal Security; and Integrated Border Management and Visa Policy
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:stresses the urgent need to establish an immigration policy that provides legal, safe and effective channels for access to the EU. This stance aligns with its previous opinions, in…
Competitiveness fund
Opinion
EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Coucil on establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence…
Defence funding in the EU
Opinion
The EESC:underscores the urgent need to address the evolving security landscape in Europe through robust and unified defence funding mechanisms. Geopolitical challenges, particularly the Russian…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…