European Economic
and Social Committee
European Social Fund+
The EESC welcomes the proposal for the ESF+ to improve merge funds and simplify procedures, but is critical of a financial cut in EU cohesion policy, and, as regards the ESF+, of the 6% decrease of the funding allocated to it. It calls for 30% of total resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion policies to be allocated to the ESF+ and for 30% of the ESF+ resources to be earmarked for social inclusion measures.
Key points
The EESC:
- welcomes the proposal for the ESF+ to improve the merged funds and simplify procedures;
- is however highly critical of a financial cut in EU cohesion policy, and, as regards the ESF+, of the 6% decrease of the funding allocated to it;
- does not agree either with the elimination of the minimum share (currently set at 23.1%) of cohesion policy funding under the ESF+;
- disagrees with the proposal of reducing the European co-funding rate of the ESF+;
- calls for 30% of total resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion policies to be allocated to the ESF+, and, within the ESF+, for 30% of resources to be earmarked for social inclusion measures;
- asks the Commission to further simplify the rules of the ESF+ for both managing authorities and beneficiaries, while ensuring that projects comply with EU values;
- agrees that the enabling condition of active inclusion, under which Member States must have national strategies against poverty and social exclusion in order to qualify for funding under the ESF+, should continue to apply to all Member States;
- recommends to use the ESF+ in a manner consistent with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD);
- finds that partnership agreements and operational programmes should be subject to sanctions if they do not respect the obligations of the European Code of Conduct on Partnership (ECCP);
- supports the revision of the composition of the ESF+ Committee, as described in Art. 40 (2) of the Regulation;
- recommends to keep transnationality (or cross-border activities) as a major component of the operational programmes;
- deems it important to establish a high level of funding for key action in the following fields: quality youth employment, gender equality initiatives, inclusion and employment of vulnerable groups, lifelong learning and up-skilling in the context of a digitalised labour market, strengthening public services of general interest, and capacity-building of the public administration, the social partners and other CSOs;
- strongly recommends to improve the correlation between the ESF+ and the Country Specific Recommendations of the European Semester and
- strongly recommends avoiding strict conditionalities that are not in the interest of the beneficiaries.
Downloads
-
Follow-up to SOC/537 Tackling poverty and social exclusion
Recommended for you
Evaluation of European Social Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:agrees that the European Social Fund (ESF) in the period 2014-2020 made a significant contribution to promoting employability, education and training, and to fighting social…
Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:calls for raising social spending in National and Regional Partnership Plans from 14% to 20% and earmarking at least 14% for the European Social Fund (ESF) to reinforce the EU’s…
A stronger European Social Fund for a more Social Europe
News
At its January 2026 plenary session, the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) adopted an opinion calling for a significantly strengthened European Social Fund (ESF) within the future…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:stresses that the need to reduce regional and territorial disparities remains one of the key priorities of EU integration and that the use of traditional, proven and effective…