European Economic
and Social Committee
Ex-post evaluations of the Rural Development Programmes 2007/2013
Background
In conjunction with interinstitutional cooperation, the "Better law-making" agreement and the REFIT programme, the Committee is taking part in the evaluation of EU policies and legislation. This evaluation entails drawing up an inventory of the assessments, criticisms, concerns and requests of the organisations represented in the Committee and, where appropriate, of other civil society organisations, to be forwarded to the institutions assisted by the Committee under Article 300(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Further to the EESC Bureau decision of 20 September 2016 on the EESC's participation in the evaluation of EU policies and legislation, it has been decided to prepare an information report on the ex post evaluation of rural development programmes 2007-2013. This report will be limited to one or two pages of conclusions and an appendix setting out a technical report. In its conclusions, the Committee will highlight the main ways in which the policy in question has affected civil society and, if appropriate, will recommend that an opinion be adopted at a later date, possibly providing suggestions for its content. The appendix will include an inventory of consultation activities carried out and the findings thereof.
Summary of the Information Report
The EESC has found the rural development policy to be one of the most welcome EU policies. RDPs boosted regional development, stimulated economic growth and job creation and succeeded to transform the situation of the countryside across the EU.
A lack of coordination, complementariness and consistency with the actions of the other structural and cohesion funds (Social Fund, Regional Development Fund, etc.) in rural areas hindered the overall aim of a more balanced territorial development. Future RDPs should focus on vulnerable EU areas in order to achieve a better balance between rural and urban areas.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Ex-post evaluation of Horizon 2020
Opinion
Key points The EESC: Regarding effectiveness: Considers the impact of Horizon 2020 (H2020) to be positive. The programme is considered to be much better than its predecessors, delivering a…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…
EaSI ex-post evaluation – including the final evaluation of Progress MICROFINANCE facility
Opinion
Key points The EESC: specifies this evaluation is based on consultations with civil society organisations representing employers, workers and associations of various interests, as well as public…
Ex-post evaluation of Horizon 2020
News
Background: This report sets out the EESC's views on the implementation and impact of Horizon 2020, the EU's research and innovation programme for 2014-2020. The report focuses on three elements:…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
News
The European Economic and Social Committee's ECO section has adopted its evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period. They aim to assess…