European Economic
and Social Committee
Digital Fairness Act
Key points
The EESC:
- acknowledges that the Digital Fairness Act (DFA) should consolidate existing EU consumer law, by addressing gaps in consumer protection and clarifying how existing rules apply in digital markets;
- stresses that the proposal should also clarify the interaction between different legal instruments and further harmonise the rules across the European Union (EU), strengthening the Digital Single Market, providing clarity for all stakeholders, supporting the EU’s simplification agenda and ensuring a high level of consumer protection enshrined in the TFEU;
- supports the Commission’s approach of strengthening the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) enforcement mechanism, including vis-à-vis third-country traders, potentially by centralising enforcement powers for certain widespread cross-border infringements within the EU;
- recommends a balanced framework that reaffirms the principles of channel and technology neutrality, while allowing for targeted provisions in specific technological or commercial contexts. The focus should be on the actual or reasonably foreseeable impact of a commercial practice on consumers, rather than solely on the formal characteristics of a particular design or commercial technique. It further recognises the extensive references to fairness by design in the Digital Fairness Fitness Check as an idea with growing support among many stakeholders;
- recommends that the current concept of the average and vulnerable consumer be reassessed in the context of digital markets, taking due account of the influence of cognitive biases on consumer behaviour;
- recommends that the DFA harmonise and clarify influencers’ obligations under the UCPD to clearly disclose commercial communications and prohibit the promotion of harmful products, in particular to minors. It also calls for a harmonised EU definition of a digital influencer;
- takes note of the recommendations published on 13 July 2026 by the Special Panel on child safety online and stresses the need for a holistic approach addressing both the causes and effects of harmful online experiences involving all relevant stakeholders, including families, educational institutions, public authorities and civil society. Digital literacy and skills should be an integral part of this approach.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Proposal for a Regulation for the Digital Networks Act (DNA)
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:considers that a regulation as the legal instrument for the DNA is the appropriate choice for the purposes of removing internal market barriers and ensuring uniform rules;calls for…
Proposal for a Regulation for the Digital Networks Act (DNA)
News
BackgroundThe Digital Networks Act (DNA) proposal was adopted by the European Commission in January 2026 and aims to modernise the legal framework for connectivity to boost innovation and…
Fairness and competitive sustainability at the heart of the green and digital transition
News
In an opinion adopted at its plenary session on 23 February, the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) welcomed the communication of the European Commission (EC) on this year's Annual…
Strategy on Intergenerational Fairness
Opinion
The EESC Youth Test is being applied to this opinion. ESDN Youth was chosen by a group of interested youth organisations to represent all of them during the opinion-making process.Key…
Digital Networks Act (DNA) – Quality of governance key to future-proofing the EU’s digital connectivity
News
The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) backs the Commission’s proposed Digital Networks Act and says there is a need to remove internal market barriers and ensure uniform rules. Effective…