Nearly 3 000 women were killed in Europe in 2024, most of them by a current or former intimate partner. At the same time, women fleeing violence still struggle to find safe accommodation, while helplines receive almost one million calls from survivors per year. These are some of the findings of the WAVE Country Report 2025, a biannual publication by Women Against Violence Europe (WAVE). For EESC Info, WAVE gives a short analysis.

Nearly 3 000 women were killed in Europe in 2024, most of them by a current or former intimate partner. At the same time, women fleeing violence still struggle to find safe accommodation, while helplines receive almost one million calls from survivors per year. These are some of the findings of the WAVE Country Report 2025, a biannual publication by Women Against Violence Europe (WAVE). For EESC Info, WAVE gives a short analysis.

Violence against women remains one of the most widespread violations of human rights in Europe. Despite decades of advocacy and legal progress, the findings of the WAVE Country Report 2025 demonstrate that, while women across Europe continue to face significant risks, the services designed to protect them remain insufficiently funded and unevenly distributed.

Published by WAVE (Women Against Violence Europe), the Country Report provides a comprehensive overview of women’s specialist services in 46 European countries, including national women’s helplines, shelters, women’s centres, services for survivors of sexualised violence, and prevention initiatives. The report also examines emerging issues such as technology-facilitated violence, offering a detailed picture of the realities facing survivors and the organisations supporting them. A separate chapter examines femicide in Europe, presenting available data on gender-related killings of women and analysing gaps in monitoring and prevention systems across countries.

Persistent gaps in support services

Women’s specialist services (WSS) are a cornerstone of effective responses to violence against women. These services provide essential support such as emergency accommodation, legal advocacy, psychological counselling and long-term recovery assistance. The WAVE Country Report, however, highlights persistent gaps in the funding and availability of WSS across Europe.

One of the most critical areas concerns access to safe accommodation. Across the 46 countries analysed, 3,224 shelters accessible to women provide around 48,860 bed spaces for survivors and their children. While this represents an increase compared to previous reporting, it remains far below the minimum standards recommended by the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention. Only 12 out of the 46 countries currently meet the benchmark of one family place in a shelter per 10,000 inhabitants, meaning that the vast majority of European countries still lack sufficient safe accommodation for women fleeing violence.

These gaps have direct consequences for survivors. When shelters operate at full capacity, women may be forced to remain in unsafe environments, travel long distances to access protection, or face further risks through sofa-surfing or even sleeping on the street. Limited shelter capacity also places significant pressure on frontline organisations already working under constrained resources.

Helplines are another crucial entry point for survivors seeking support. By 2024, 39 out of 46 European countries (85%) reported having at least one national women’s helpline, with most operating free of charge and available 24 hours a day. These services collectively received nearly one million calls in 2024, demonstrating both the scale of the problem and the central role of helplines in connecting survivors with assistance.

The realities faced by frontline organisations

Women’s specialist services remain the backbone of support for survivors across Europe. Many shelters, counselling centres and helplines were established by feminist civil society organisations and continue to operate through survivor-centred, rights-based approaches grounded in decades of expertise.

However, the Country Report shows that many of these services operate under difficult conditions. Although most shelters receive some form of state or municipal funding, financial support is often short-term, project-based, or insufficient for long-term planning. This creates uncertainty for organisations as they struggle to maintain staffing levels, expand services, or respond to increasing demand.

Women’s centres play a particularly important role in providing non-residential support, including legal advice, psychological counselling and advocacy. Across Europe, at least 3,401 women’s centres are currently operating, but this still represents a major gap compared to recommended levels of service provision. On average, Europe has one centre for every 129,329 women, reflecting a shortfall of approximately 61% compared to recommended coverage levels.

These services are often the first place women turn when seeking help, especially if they are not yet ready or able to leave an abusive situation.

Emerging forms of violence

Alongside long-standing forms of gender-based violence, new challenges are emerging that require urgent attention from policymakers. One of the most significant developments highlighted in the WAVE Country Report 2025 is the rapid growth of technology-facilitated violence against women and girls (TFVAWG).

Across Europe, 37 out of 46 countries reported an increase in technology-facilitated violence over the past two years. In nine countries, respondents to WAVE’s survey could not give a definitive answer, mainly because such data is not systematically collected. The most commonly reported forms include cyberstalking, digital surveillance and spyware, as well as online harassment, hate speech and threats. Image-based abuse, including the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, is also increasingly reported.

These forms of TFVAWG often intersect with offline abuse. Perpetrators may use digital tools to monitor victims, share intimate material without consent, or continue harassment long after a relationship has ended. Survivors frequently face barriers to reporting these crimes, including stigma, uncertainty about where to seek support, limited awareness among police and justice actors of existing legal protections, and the frequent absence of adequate legal frameworks to address tech-facilitated violence against women. 

Women in public roles, such as journalists, politicians and human rights defenders, are particularly targeted by coordinated online attacks intended to silence or discredit them.

The continued reality of femicide

The most extreme form of violence against women remains femicide, the gender-related killing of women and girls. Data gathered by WAVE delegates and national experts indicates that at least 2,871 women were victims of femicide in Europe in 2024, based on data available from 35 countries.

In countries where additional information was available, 76% of victims were killed by a current or former intimate partner, a stark reminder of the far too frequent lethal consequences of domestic violence. However, the report emphasises that these numbers likely represent minimum estimates due to the continued lack of consistent monitoring and data collection across Europe.

In many countries, femicide data is primarily collected by feminist civil society organisations rather than state institutions, reflecting ongoing gaps in official monitoring systems. 

The need for stronger political commitment

Europe has taken important steps to address violence against women in recent years, including the adoption of the EU Directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence in 2024. However, the WAVE Country Report 2025 makes clear that legislation alone is not sufficient.

Ensuring effective protection for survivors requires sustained political commitment, adequate funding for women’s specialist services, and the full implementation of existing legal frameworks, including the Istanbul Convention.

Women’s organisations across Europe have demonstrated extraordinary resilience and dedication in supporting survivors and advocating for change. Strengthening and sustaining their work is essential if Europe is to move closer to a future where all women and girls can live free from violence.

WAVE (Women Against Violence Europe) is a feminist network of over 160 women’s specialist organisations working to end violence against women and girls across Europe. Based in Vienna, WAVE strengthens the capacity of women’s support services and advocates for survivor-centred policies through research, advocacy, and training. Its flagship publication, the WAVE Country Report, monitors the availability and quality of women’s specialist services across Europe.

Created in response to the prevalence of 'manels' in policy debates and conferences in the EU capital, the Brussels Binder is now a trusted directory for conference organisers in search of women speakers. Their free database now lists 2000 women experts (and counting) across all sorts of policy areas. Although the initiative has already begun to shift habits in Brussels, the Brussels Binder - one of the winners of the 2019 Civil Society Prize for Gender Equality – tell us the job is far from done: the EU will not close its gender gaps if women remain underrepresented in policy debates. 

Created in response to the prevalence of 'manels' in policy debates and conferences in the EU capital, the Brussels Binder is now a trusted directory for conference organisers in search of women speakers. Their free database now lists 2000 women experts (and counting) across all sorts of policy areas. Although the initiative has already begun to shift habits in Brussels, the Brussels Binder - one of the winners of the 2019 Civil Society Prize for Gender Equality – tell us the job is far from done: the EU will not close its gender gaps if women remain underrepresented in policy debates. 

 

Could you tell us a little bit more about your story and purpose? How was Brussels Binder created and what prompted you to launch it?

Back in 2015, a small group of women working in Brussels think tanks began meeting informally to exchange ideas about the policy debates happening around us. In those conversations, we kept coming back to the same observation: women were still underrepresented on conference panels in Brussels.

That was clearly wrong in a city where experts from across Europe gather to inform and shape major policy discussions. Further research confirmed what we were seeing ─ panels were often overwhelmingly male.

So we created a practical solution: a database of women policy experts that event organisers, journalists and institutions could easily turn to. The database remains at the centre of our work, but today our activities are broader. We organise events, advocate for more diverse panels, monitor 'manels' and encourage panel organisers to make sure theirs has gender balance.

 

Your organisation was founded nine years ago in Brussels. How much has your database with female experts grown since? Do you feel you have made a difference with your initiative – are women experts invited to take part in EU policy debates more frequently thanks to your initiative? Do you have any figures on the current situation with regard to manels and the proportion of women speakers on panels?

Today, the Brussels Binder database includes an impressive 2000 women experts across a wide range of policy fields, and it continues to grow.

We believe we have made a difference. Panel organisers in Brussels are much more conscious today of the need to ensure their discussions are diverse. There is also a growing understanding that simply adding a female moderator is not the solution ─ something we have highlighted in our own campaigns.

We also run a reporting system where people can flag 'manels'. When that happens, we contact organisers in a constructive way, offering support and directing them to our database. We are increasingly seeing positive responses and commitments to do better.

For our tenth anniversary next year, we plan to analyse the available data more systematically and present a clearer picture of progress in panel diversity in Brussels.

 

The Commission has just unveiled its new Gender Equality Strategy. What are your views on the strategy?

It’s encouraging to see the Strategy highlight the importance of women’s participation in public and political life, and to recognise the role civil society can play in advancing gender equality.

At the same time, one pillar of a healthy democracy still needs stronger ambition: women’s fair representation in public debate and policymaking. Equality is not only about protection and opportunity; it is also about visibility and a seat at the tables where decisions are shaped.

The EU cannot close its gender gaps if women remain underrepresented in expert panels, media debates and key policy discussions. Continued efforts to ensure more balanced representation in public debate will be essential.

 

You have recently launched FORGE – Forum for Gender Equality in Europe. Could you tell us a few words about its set up and goals?

FORGE is a new coalition bringing together nine civil society organisations working on gender equality at European level. The Brussels Binder is a founding member, together with HerVoicEU and HerEU.

The idea is to create a stronger, collective civil society voice on gender equality in European policymaking. Each organisation brings its own expertise, networks and perspective, but we share the same goal: ensuring that women’s participation, leadership and visibility remain central to decision-making across Europe.

With the new EU Gender Equality Strategy for 2026–2030, FORGE aims to contribute policy expertise and practical recommendations to support its implementation and help turn commitments into real progress.

 

In 2019, you were one of the winners of the EESC Civil Society Prize for gender equality. What did the prize mean to you at the time?

Winning the European Economic and Social Committee Civil Society Prize in 2019 was a very meaningful recognition of our work. For a small, largely volunteer-driven initiative, it was encouraging to see the importance of women’s representation in public debate acknowledged at European level. We were, and remain, grateful to the EESC for recognising and shining a spotlight on our work.

The prize helped increase our visibility and also supported practical improvements to the project, including strengthening our database and expanding our outreach, training and community activities.

 

How can people support the work of the Brussels Binder?

First, use our database. If you are organising panels or events, it will help you find women experts.

Second, women experts can sign up to the database, making their expertise visible and helping ensure their voices are heard.

Third, organisations can become official partners of the Binder, where we work on initiatives together, or support us in other ways ─ for example by hosting events or inviting Brussels Binder speakers.

Finally, individuals ─ women and men ─ can join us as volunteer members and become part of our dynamic, committed community. We have a serious goal, but we promise fun along the way.

 

The Brussels Binder is the go-to resource for improving gender balance in policy debates. The Brussels Binder is a common good – a free database consisting of profiles of female experts based in Europe. It covers a multitude of sectors and it is constantly growing. It is a place where women experts connect and exchange.

To mark International Women’s Day 2026 (IWD2026), the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) rolled out a programme of events and communications focusing on women’s roles in media, their experiences of harassment and invisibility, and the critical but often undervalued work they perform across Europe. The Committee’s activities underscored a common message: women’s safety, dignity and recognition are essential pillars of a fair and democratic society.

To mark International Women’s Day 2026 (IWD2026), the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) rolled out a programme of events and communications focusing on women’s roles in media, their experiences of harassment and invisibility, and the critical but often undervalued work they perform across Europe. The Committee’s activities underscored a common message: women’s safety, dignity and recognition are essential pillars of a fair and democratic society.

Through its IWD2026 programme, the EESC delivered a clear and consistent message: women’s contributions – whether in newsrooms, care roles or civic spaces - must be visible, valued and protected.

Strengthening women’s voices and safety in media

The EESC Equality Group hosted a high‑level conference entitled Challenges for Women in Media – supporting and hindering factors, examining the obstacles faced by women journalists and creators, especially those navigating online spaces.

In her opening remarks, Christa Schweng, President of the Equality Group, stressed the significance of the issue: 'Women in media continue to face structural barriers, targeted harassment, and persistent stereotypes… Gender equality in media is not only a matter of fairness: it is a matter of democracy, safety, and societal integrity.'

Speakers highlighted the persistence of gender stereotypes and the impact of online harassment, including technology‑facilitated gender‑based violence. They described how digital platforms, while offering visibility, have also become major sources of intimidation, threats and exploitation for women.

Participants also stressed that despite representing over 40% of journalists worldwide, women remain significantly underrepresented in senior editorial roles, weakening their influence on public narratives and newsroom culture

EESC Vice‑President for Communication Marija Hanževački drew attention to the need for robust implementation of EU legal instruments: 'Regulation is needed so that women’s safety and agency in offline and online media can be ensured.'

Experts called for full and effective use of the European Media Freedom Act, the Digital Services Act and the Directive on combating violence against women, emphasising the need for strong national transposition and civil‑society oversight.

Belarusian independent journalist in exile Hanna Liubakova illustrated the risks faced by women in exile and under authoritarian regimes, pointing to travel restrictions, limited access to basic rights, and the psychological toll of state repression..

"When the authorities put me on the terrorist watch list, some people from Belarus started to ask me what I had done. It's painful to see how the regime influences people's minds," Ms Liubakova said. She underscored the transnational nature of this repression, which makes it difficult for journalists to travel safely without risking arrest in countries cooperating with the Belarusian regime.

A short wrap-up video of the conference can be found here.

Invisible Work, Visible Impact: Recognising essential contributions

During Civil Society Week, the EESC also hosted a discussion on the largely unrecognised work performed by women in Europe – from care and domestic work to essential services carried out by both EU and migrant women. This event entitled Invisible Work, Visible Impac" placed a spotlight on how unpaid and informal work sustains households, communities and economies, yet frequently remains unprotected and undervalued.

Opening the panel, EESC President Séamus Boland highlighted the systemic neglect of women’s labour: 'The absence of respect and the absence of dignity afforded to women – often migrant women – whose work is taken for granted, ignored and undervalued in our societies.'

The three key themes dominated the debate:

Unpaid care work, performed predominantly by women, is indispensable to European societies but often results in financial insecurity, isolation and reduced career opportunities.

Migrant women frequently work in undervalued sectors such as domestic work and long‑term care. Many arrive with formal qualifications that remain unrecognised, limiting their employment opportunities despite acute labour shortages in essential services.

Long‑term care systems depend heavily on both unpaid carers and migrant workers, yet policy frameworks still overlook their needs and protections.

Panellists called for better recognition of qualifications, fair pay, stronger labour protections, gender‑responsive migration policies and long‑term investment in care as essential social infrastructure.

EESC delegation at UNCSW70

The EESC marked International Women’s Day 2026 not only in Brussels but also on the global stage, sending a delegation to the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (UNCSW70) in New York. The delegation contributed to discussions on the year’s priority theme – ensuring access to justice for all women and girls – and highlighted the Committee’s work on equality, civil society participation and women’s rights. The EESC also adopted a resolution on UNCSW70 in the run-up to the event. 

To accompany the EESC’s presence at UNCSW70, EESC Vice‑President for Budget Alena Mastantuono recorded a dedicated video message underlining the importance of strong institutions, inclusive justice systems and continued international cooperation in advancing gender equality. (lm)

Thank you!

Minutes of the 238th TEN Section meeting on 9.3.26

Download — EESC-2026-00755-00-00-PV-TRA — (Minutes)

Notice of meeting for the 239th meeting of the TEN section on 9.4.26

Download — EESC-2026-00757-00-00-CONVPOJ-TRA — (Agenda)

Blue diplomacy and water cooperation – solutions to relieve the pressure of climate induced migration
DG ENV – Commissioner ROSWALL

A just transition to ensure a sustainable future for EU agri-food systems
DG AGRI– Commissioner HANSEN

Enhancing Fiscal Transparency through Participatory Budgeting in the EU
DG BUDG – Commissioner SERAFIN

Additional considerations on the way forward for the European Semester 2025
DG ECFIN – Commissioner DOMBROVSKIS