Opinions

  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    SOC/556-EESC-2016-06889-00-00-ac-tra
    (Netherlands

    The EESC considers the intention to create ETIAS as a currently inevitable step corresponding to the threats caused by external and internal circumstances. ETIAS should be based on the right balance between risks and safety, at the same time avoiding increased administrative burdens and barriers for people travelling to the EU. The Committee stresses that ETIAS should fully respect the fundamental rights of applicants and avoid any discrimination. All data gathered by the system must be protected and access to it should be strictly limited. All applicants should be allowed to use the services of intermediaries to obtain the travel authorisation, if needed. However, the costs charged by these intermediaries for their services should be monitored and evaluated by EU delegations in the third countries.

    Download — EESC opinion: Establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS)
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    TEN/618-EESC-2016
    (Romania
    Download — EESC opinion: Revision of the Energy Efficiency Directive
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    TEN/617-EESC-2016
    (United Kingdom
    Download — EESC opinion: Governance of the Energy Union
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    TEN/624-EESC-2016
    (Germany
    (Croatia

    The EESC welcomes the "clean energy" package, which aims to accelerate, transform and consolidate the EU economy's clean energy transition, while pursuing the important goals of economic growth and job creation. The proposed package includes important proposals in the areas of renewable energies and electricity market design and regulation, energy efficiency and energy performance of buildings, energy innovations, transport, and governance – and the Committee views many of the initiatives favourably. However, the opinion – drawing on nine other opinions concerned with the individual proposals of the clean energy package – also identifies a number of challenges that civil society and co-legislators need to be aware of.

    Download — EESC opinion: Clean Energy For All Europeans package
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    TEN/622-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany
    (Sweden
    Download — EESC opinion: Revision of the Renewable Energies Directive
    • Cooperation between EU Member States under the RES Directive
    • Design features of support schemes for renewable electricity
    • Mid-term evaluation of the Renewable Energy Directive
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 10/11/2016
    Reference
    TEN/616-EESC-2017
    (United Kingdom

    The EESC proposes an EU Platform For Change ("Platform"), to address gender equality in transport, initially prioritising increasing women's employability in the sector. This initial objective could later be supplemented by including "women as users". Membership could include, but not exclusively, EU- and national-level representative bodies of policy makers, the transport industries, their trade unions, media, passenger organisations and NGOs willing to commit to concrete actions to address gender inequality in transport.

    Download — EESC opinion: Women and Transport – Platform for Change
    • She Moves - Women's Issues in Transportation
  • Adopted on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 22/09/2016
    Reference
    CCMI/147-EESC-2016
    (Spain
    (France

    Banking and insurance are evolving. Insurance companies and banks are at the forefront of the development of the digital economy. The very nature of their activities lends itself to the intensive use of the new technologies. In a highly competitive framework marked by a keener pursuit of competitiveness, insurance companies and banks have become part of an ongoing drive for innovation.

    Download — EESC opinion: Digitalisation and innovative business models in the European financial sector, impact on employment and customers (own-initiative opinion)
  • Adopted on 30/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 18/10/2016
    Reference
    ECO/424-EESC-2016-06799-00-00-ac-tra
    (Belgium

    The EESC very much welcomes the Commission’s package of proposals and hopes that it will contribute effectively to complementing the work done after the crisis to reform the financial sector. The Committee welcomes the underlying holistic and integrated approach and believes that the proposed measures will undoubtedly help strengthen Europe’s prudential and resolution framework for banks. The Committee also these proposals will enable progress to be made not only in further advancing the Banking Union, but also in implementing its third pillar, the European Deposit Insurance Scheme and that certain specific adjustments in the proposals should facilitate the pursuit of a Capital Markets Union.

    Download — EESC opinion: Amendment to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) to incorporate modifications to the BASEL framework and findings from various reviews required under CRR. (working title)
    • Agence Europe - 31.3.2017
  • Adopted on 30/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 18/10/2016
    Reference
    INT/809-EESC-2016-05992-00-00-AC-TRA
    (Lithuania

    The EESC welcomes the communication of the European Commission on a "Space Strategy for Europe" and endorses the proposed guidelines. The EESC encourages the Commission to continue on this path and to set its sights on even more ambitious horizons. The Committee emphasizes that space activities are nowadays part of everyday life of European citizens. It focuses on the crucial role of SMEs as well as on the education and public awareness raising as far as space activities are concerned.

    Download — EESC opinion: Space Strategy for Europe (Communication)
  • Adopted on 30/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    INT/808-EESC-2016-05923-00-00-ac-tra
    (Malta

    Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

    Download — EESC opinion: Nautical and maritime tourism diversification strategies
  • Adopted on 30/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    SOC/550-EESC-2016-05685-00-00-ac-tra
    Employers - GR I
    Austria
    Workers - GR II
    Italy

    In the context of the revision of the founding regulations of the three agencies EUROFOUND, CEDEFOP and EU-OSHA, the Committee expresses its views on general principles governing these bodies and puts forward specific comments for each agency. The EESC warmly welcomes the fact that the balanced, tripartite structure of the management board is to be maintained. The Committee considers that tripartism is the expression of an inclusive approach, which respects the importance of the role of the social partners in seeking joint solutions. The EESC believes that the overall objectives of the three agencies should be uniformly and more comprehensively defined as to "support the needs of all EU institutions and bodies, Member States and Social Partners".

    Download — EESC opinion: Eurofound, Cedefop & EU-OSHA Regulations
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 21/02/2017
    Reference
    ECO/431-EESC-2017-01107-00-00-ac-tra
    Download — EESC opinion: Territorial typologies
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    REX/482-EESC-2017
    (Netherlands

    The EESC believes that the current framework for international ocean governance is unable to ensure the sustainable management of oceans and their resources, and urgent action is imperative. However, the Commission and the High Representative still need to prioritise the threats currently faced by our oceans in order to adequately reflect the urgent need for action. One of the causes of ineffective international ocean governance is the existence of gaps in the current international ocean governance framework. The EESC recommends that the Commission and High Representative address these gaps and inconsistencies, but also that they increase compliance with existing rules, for example by improving the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The EU should refrain from proposing any new legislation when better or more coordinated implementation of existing rules and regulations would be more efficient.

    Download — EESC opinion: International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans (Communication)
    • International Ocean Governance
    • Factsheet EU Acting for our oceans
    • EU and International Ocean Governance
    • International Ocean Governance: EU's contribution
    • JOIN(2016)49 final: International Ocean Governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans
    • International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans: List of Actions
    • SWD(2016)352: International Ocean Governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    REX/483-EESC-2017
    Workers - GR II
    Germany
    Employers - GR I
    Spain

    The EESC is committed to open and fair trade and recognises its value as a driver of growth and jobs. Therefore, the EESC calls for a level playing field between European and third country exporting producers, and for effective trade defence instruments. The EESC supports the Commission's proposal that the dumping margin should be calculated not using the standard methodology, but on the basis of benchmarks that take account of significantly distorted production and sale costs. The EESC points out that in its 2016 opinion on preserving sustainable jobs and growth in the steel industry, it already called for the standard methodology not to be used in anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese imports as long as the country failed to meet the EU's five criteria for market economy status. The EESC welcomes the Commission's intention of using specific criteria to determine whether there are significant distortions in the market situation.

  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 24/01/2017
    Reference
    TEN/627-EESC-2017
    (Netherlands
    Download — EESC opinion: Repeal of Regulations in the transport sector
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Reference
    NAT/701-EESC-2017
    Workers - GR II
    Germany

    The EESC opinion  provides input to the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on the definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs and the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks.

    Download — EESC opinion: Spirit drinks
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 18/10/2016
    Reference
    INT/810-EESC-2016-06275-00-AC-TRA
    (Italy
    Workers - GR II
    France

    Normal 0 21 false false false FR-BE X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

    Download — EESC opinion: Business Insolvency
    • CEPS Report
    • EP Report
    • EP Study
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 18/10/2016
    Reference
    ECO/425-EESC-2016-01-01-06465-00-01-ac-tra
    Employers - GR I
    Bulgaria
    Download — EESC opinion: EU Regulatory Framework for Financial Services (Communication)
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    ECO/418-EESC-2016-05508-00-00-ac-tra
    Employers - GR I
    Malta

    In the opinion on "Inclusive Islands" drawn up at the request of the Maltese Presidency of the EU, the EESC identifies permanent solutions for islands to address their structural difficulties. Europe's islands are home to over 21 million people. They account for approximately 4% of the EU-28's total population. There is therefore an urgent need for the adoption of an integrated policy framework to address the economic, social and territorial cohesion issues faced by European islands. The EESC calls for a greater effort to be undertaken by the EU to recognise the uniqueness of the challenges facing islands.

    Download — EESC opinion: Islands in the EU: from structural handicap to inclusive territory (exploratory opinion requested by the Maltese presidency)
  • Adopted on 29/03/2017 - Bureau decision date: 07/10/2015
    Reference
    ECO/389-EESC-2016-06466-00-00-ac-tra
    Employers - GR I
    Spain
    Download — EESC opinion: Recovery and resolution of central counterparties
  • Adopted on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    TEN/607-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Estonia

    The Mid-term evaluation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is one of the evaluations on which the Commission is consulting the EESC.

    The CEF was proposed as a financing programme for the completion of trans-European infrastructure networks in the fields of transport, energy and information and communications technology (ICT).

    The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) welcomes the opportunity to take part in the evaluation of the CEF programme. Transport, energy and ICT are also the core of the EESC Smart Islands Project. Therefore, the EESC's response is based on the above mentioned project, which analyses primary data collected through fact-finding missions taking place in the EU in the course of 2015 and 2016.

    Download — Information report: Mid-term evaluation of the Connecting Europe Facility (formerly Smart Islands)
  • Adopted on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    TEN/606-EESC-2016
    Workers - GR II
    Spain

    The EESC welcomes the CEF's support for clean, low-carbon transport and sustainable energy structures, as well as the attention given to energy vulnerability. However, the Committee would like to see more financial resources allocated to the CEF.

    It will be possible to meet the expectations of city "users" – inhabitants, businesses, visitors and administrators – thanks to digital service ecosystems overlaying high-quality material and immaterial enabling infrastructure. Establishing this infrastructure will also have a significant impact in terms of growth, employment and productivity.

    Download — Information report: Mid-term evaluation of the Connecting Europe Facility (formerly Smart Cities)
  • Adopted on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 12/07/2016
    Reference
    TEN/609-EESC-2016
    (Sweden

    The EESC endorses the European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility (the strategy), including its aims and methods, and its holistic approach, which provides coherence between transport and other policy areas. It would have liked this approach to be further developed in terms of the links between the strategy and the communication on the upgrading of the internal market. This also applies with regard to the prospects of the digital economy and the development of a sharing economy and a circular economy. It underscores the potential effects of these developments on transport patterns, and draws attention to their social implications.

    Download — EESC opinion: Decarbonisation of transport
  • Adopted on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    NAT/689-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany

    This exploratory opinion was drawn up at the request of the European Commission in the framework of the mid-term evaluation of the LIFE programme over the 2014-2020 period. It reiterates the support of the European civil society in favour of an independent budget line dedicated to the environment and looks at possible options for improving LIFE after 2020.

    Download — EESC opinion: Mid-term evaluation of the LIFE Programme
  • Adopted on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 21/01/2016
    Reference
    NAT/679-EESC-2016
    (United Kingdom
    Download — EESC opinion: Role of Agriculture in Multilateral, Bilateral and Regional Trade negotiations in the light of the Nairobi WTO Ministerial meeting (own-initiative opinion)