European Economic
and Social Committee
The Minimum Wages Directive risks making Europe a better place.
The European Commission's proposal for a directive on adequate minimum wages has sparked controversy among member states and social partners alike across Europe. This controversy is mirrored within the EESC, which adopted this week an opinion favourable to the directive.
The proposal, presented by the Commission, dares to develop the principles of the Social Pillar, and risks having a positive impact on the working and living conditions of millions of workers in Europe. Particularly during the pandemic, essential workers, formerly just called precarious, were fundamental in keeping our economies and societies working. These workers cannot afford to earn a living wage.
The potential danger however is not limited to essential workers: adequate minimum wages across the EU would increase the disposable income of workers, raising internal demand and helping economic growth. This is a danger to all society, particularly during the economic crisis brought by the pandemic. Legal concerns, despite the Council assessment acknowledging the legal basis for EU action, are also in order: it has not been proven beyond any doubt that this proposal could not violate any legislation, in any form, at any given point, now, or in the distant future.
Beyond the eminent moral hazard of improving the population's living and working conditions and fostering economic growth, the dangerous precedent set by this proposal must be assessed carefully. The very existence of the EU and of democracy as a whole is endangered by the rising levels of inequality and poverty, fuelling the flames of populism across Europe. Successful EU action combatting poverty risks leaving Eurosceptic and extremist parties without arguments, and therefore depriving their politicians of their jobs. With the rising unemployment figures amidst the crisis, this is clearly something not acceptable.
Europeans are for the most part in favour of a more social Europe. This however does not mean that they want tangible measures that improve their living conditions and enable them to have better jobs and be more productive and happy. On the contrary, what this tells us is that Europeans desire and crave non-binding recommendations, and will obtain great relief from their mention in preambles of legislation across Europe. Beautiful, enticing words, accompanied by complete absence of action, are fundamental to regain the trust of Europeans.
Work organisation
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTOS CLAVE El CESE: Considerando que el contenido de la propuesta es satisfactorio y no es objeto de ninguna observación por su parte, decidió emitir un dictamen favorable sobre la propuesta.
La UE necesita más inversión pública en infraestructuras energéticas para luchar contra el cambio climático
News
En un Dictamen aprobado en el pleno de septiembre, el Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) afirma que se necesita una inversión pública masiva para lograr la transición energética y cumplir los…
Energía: el CESE advierte contra la creación de nuevas dependencias
News
El Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) se pronuncia con firmeza sobre la energía en un Dictamen aprobado en su pleno de septiembre: la propuesta de la Comisión es un paso en la dirección…
La transición digital debe ser justa: los derechos humanos y el control humano deben seguir teniendo una importancia fundamental
News
El Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) señala las oportunidades que presenta la revolución digital, pero también advierte de sus peligros: si se implantan con demasiada rapidez, las soluciones…
La UE necesita ya un plan de acción para ofrecer una vivienda asequible y digna
News
En la conferencia de alto nivel que el Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) celebró en Riga los participantes dieron la voz de alarma por la crisis de la vivienda asequible y advirtieron que ya…