Kompetittività

This page is also available in:

  • Adopted on 21/09/2016 - Bureau decision date: 15/03/2016
    Reference
    ECO/407-EESC-2016-01-01-02391-00-00-ac-tra
    (Romania
    Workers - GR II
    Romania

    Fighting against tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning, both at the EU and at a global level, is an important political priority for the European Union. The EESC welcomes and endorses the Commission proposal, which aims to make the taxation system more transparent as this measure will boost public confidence. The EESC suggests that the Commission should aim for a more ambitious package. It proposes the disclosure of a wider range of data, the gradual reduction of the turnover threshold of EUR 750 Million and that the disclosed data is made publicly available in one of the official languages of the EU in order to achieve the objective of giving the public genuine access to data for the whole single market.

    EESC opinion: Proposal on public tax transparency (country-by-country reporting)
  • Adopted on 13/07/2016 - Bureau decision date: 15/03/2016
    Reference
    ECO/406-EESC-2016-01-01-02343-00-01-ac-tra
    (Belgium
    Diversity Europe - GR III
    Italy

    The EESC welcomes the "Action Plan on VAT", and calls for a  definitive VAT system that is clear, consistent, robust and comprehensive, as well as proportionate and future-proof. The Committee  welcomes the strong focus on closing the VAT gap and tackling the susceptibility of VAT to fraud. There should be results delivered without delay, including by improving cooperation between tax administrations. “Bona fide” enterprises should be protected and no new excessive measures should be imposed on them. The future system of reduced rates must combine flexibility and legal certainty, be transparent, and for the sake of simplicity the number of reduced rates and exemptions must be limited.

    EESC opinion: Action Plan on VAT
    VAT Action Plan - Measures to modernise VAT in the EU - Bertrand LAPALUS - DG TAXUD
  • Adopted on 27/04/2016 - Bureau decision date: 16/02/2016
    Reference
    ECO/405-EESC-2016-01-01-01284-00-00-AC-TRA
    Workers - GR II
    Romania
    (United Kingdom

    The EESC has in numerous opinions urged for a fair, efficient and growth-friendly corporate tax system, based on the principle that companies should pay taxes in the country where profits are generated. Thus, the Committee welcomes the Commission’s initiatives intended to combat aggressive tax planning and broadly supports the proposed measures as regards the essential elements of the two legislative proposals, the Anti-Tax-Avoidance-Directive as well as the Directive on Administrative Cooperation. It advocates for a more precise scope and framework in certain specific areas (such as e.g. the switch-over clause). The Committee urges to finish drawing up the list of countries or regions which refuse to apply good governance standards and considers that the envisaged legislative measures should not apply to SMEs.

    EESC opinion: The Anti Tax Avoidance Package
  • Adopted on 16/03/2016 - Bureau decision date: 08/12/2015
    Reference
    ECO/398-EESC-2016-01-01-00122-00-00-ac-tra
    Diversity Europe - GR III
    Greece
    EESC opinion: Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013
  • Adopted on 16/03/2016 - Bureau decision date: 08/12/2015
    Reference
    ECO/397-EESC-2015-01-01-06712-00-01-ac-tra
    (Austria
    (Belgium

    The EESC welcomes the establishment of economic priority programmes for the euro area at the start of the European Semester. To achieve a recovery of growth and employment a mix of financial, taxation, budgetary, economic and social policies is needed. In contrast to the recommendation of the Commission, the focus of fiscal policy should be designed to be more expansionist than neutral. The EESC advocates the reduction of taxation on labour insofar as it does not threaten the financial sustainability of social protection systems. The EESC calls for a coordinated effort to create a more business-friendly environment for SMEs through better regulation, adequate financing and facilitation of exports to markets outside the EU. There is a particular need to open up new funding opportunities for micro-enterprises and start-ups.

    EESC opinion: Economic policy of the euro area
  • Adopted on 16/03/2016 - Bureau decision date: 10/11/2015
    Reference
    ECO/395-EESC-2015-01-01-06711-00-00-ac-tra
    (Austria
    (Ireland

    Competitiveness is not an end in itself. It is only a sensible objective if it improves people's well-being in practice. The EESC therefore recommends that an updated definition of competitiveness ("competitiveness 2.0") be used in future, taking into account "the ability of a country to deliver the beyond-GDP goals for its citizens". The EESC urges that future discussions refer not to "competitiveness boards" but to "boards for competitiveness, social cohesion and sustainability". The EESC asks the Commission to present concrete proposals on how the following necessary requirements with regards to these boards can be safeguarded: accountability, legitimacy and transparency; representation of balanced unbiased expertise; non-binding character of proposals of the boards; inclusion of the dual role of wages, both as a cost factor and as the main determinant of domestic demand.

    EESC opinion: Establishment of National Competitiveness Boards within the Euro Area
  • Adopted on 16/03/2016 - Bureau decision date: 10/11/2015
    Reference
    ECO/394-EESC-2015-01-01-06709-00-00-ac-tra
    (Italy

    The Commission communication on Steps towards completing EMU can provide a great opportunity to launch a debate at political level and with civil society to draw up conclusive proposals which go further than the current ones. It would be more useful to draw up a proposal for the European Semester as part of a comprehensive agreement on economic governance that goes beyond the status quo, changing macroconditionality and strengthening the Interparliamentary Conference. Democratic legitimacy is not tackled seriously by any of the Commission's operational proposals. The tripartite social dialogue could contribute to this matter. On the basis of its own roadmap, the EESC is committed to putting forward, possibly with the Commission, a plan on stage two (Completing EMU 2017-2025) to discuss these issues in the Member States, beginning with the euro area countries.

    EESC opinion: Steps towards Completing Economic and Monetary Union
  • Adopted on 09/12/2015
    Reference
    ECO/383-EESC-2015-02961-00-01-ac-tra
    Workers - GR II
    Romania
    Employers - GR I
    Portugal
    Plenary session number
    512
    -

    The EESC expresses its support for the Commission in combating the erosion of Member States' tax bases and unfair tax competition. The Committee in this context endorses the introduction of a CCCTB and is also pleased that the Commission has published a list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The EESC goes even further and proposes that EU rules should include sanctions for companies that continue to run their business through tax havens.

    Slideshow DG TAXUD – A Fair and Efficient Corporate Taxation
  • Adopted on 08/10/2015
    Reference
    ECO/382-EESC-2015-01-01-03720-00-01-ac-tra
    Workers - GR II
    Italy
    Plenary session number
    511
    -

    Following the Baltic, Danube and Adriatic Ionian Regions, the Alpine space was the fourth to adopt its macro-regional strategy on 28 July 2015. The EESC welcomes the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region and sees it as an element of value added for the Alpine area as well as a driver for development that can nurture the competitiveness and cohesion of Europe as a whole.

  • Adopted on 17/09/2015
    Reference
    ECO/378-EESC-2015-01-01-02060-00-00-ac-tra
    Diversity Europe - GR III
    Spain
    Workers - GR II
    Italy
    Plenary session number
    510
    -

    The Economy for the Common Good model proposes the transition towards a "European Ethical Market" which will foster social innovation, boost the employment rate and benefit the environment, for example through using indicators of wellbeing and social development beyond the GDP such as the Common Good Product and the Common Good Balance Sheet. The EESC considers that the Economy for the Common Good model is conceived to be included both in the European and the domestic legal framework and demands from the European Commission, in the framework of the upcoming renewed CSR strategy, to make a qualitative step in order to reward (in terms of public procurement, access to external markets, tax advantages, etc.) those enterprises that can demonstrate higher ethical performance.

    Towards a better measurement of welfare
    Scoping study
    L'économie circulaire