Tiek izstrādāti (updated on 28/04/2023)
Atsauce:
NAT/899-EESCRapporteur:
Plenārsesija:
582 -
Oct 25, 2023 Oct 26, 2023
Climate Adjustment Fund financed by Cohesion and NGEU - Related Opinions
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
Tiek izstrādāti (updated on 04/04/2023)
Atsauce:
SOC/770-EESCRapporteur:
Plenārsesija:
582 -
Oct 25, 2023 Oct 26, 2023
Pieņemtie on 26/10/2022
Atsauce:
TEN/770-EESC-2022Rapporteur:
Thomas KATTNIG (Workers - GR II/Austria), Lutz RIBBE (Diversity Europe - GR III/Germany), Tomasz Andrzej WRÓBLEWSKI (Employers - GR I/Poland) (Workers - GR II / Austria)
Plenārsesija:
573 -
Oct 26, 2022 Oct 27, 2022
Pieņemtie on 08/12/2021
Atsauce:
NAT/831-EESC-2021Rapporteur:
Pieņemtie on 07/07/2021
Atsauce:
NAT/815-EESC-2021Referral:
COM(2021) 82 final Rapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Downloads:
Pieņemtie on 17/10/2018
Atsauce:
ECO/462-EESC-2018-03269Referral:
COM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 CODCOM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 CODCOM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 CODRapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Ester VITALE (Italy)
The EESC considers the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF) as pivotal factors to achieve sustainable development in the EU and therefore strongly regrets the cut of 12% in the ERDF and 46% in the CF.
Pieņemtie on 19/09/2018
Atsauce:
ECO/460-EESC-2018-02072-00-00Referral:
COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 322 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 322 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 325 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2018) 325 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2018) 326 final 2018/0131 NLECOM(2018) 327 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 327 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 328 final 2018/0133 NLERapporteur:
Europeans need more (and better) Europe. The powers and financial resources currently allocated to the EU have been increasingly misaligned with the concerns and expectations of Europeans. The EESC, in accordance with the European Parliament's position, therefore proposes that the expenditure and revenue figure reach 1.3% of GNI. The proposed level of commitments of 1.11% of the EU's GNI is too modest to credibly deliver on the political agenda of the EU.
The EESC recognises the high European added value of the programmes where the MFF 2021-2027 concentrates the main increases in expenditure. However, the Committee questions the fact that these increases are made at the cost of strong cuts in cohesion policy (-10%) and the Common Agricultural Policy – CAP (-15%).
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8