The EESC believes that the current framework for international ocean governance is unable to ensure the sustainable management of oceans and their resources, and urgent action is imperative. However, the Commission and the High Representative still need to prioritise the threats currently faced by our oceans in order to adequately reflect the urgent need for action. One of the causes of ineffective international ocean governance is the existence of gaps in the current international ocean governance framework. The EESC recommends that the Commission and High Representative address these gaps and inconsistencies, but also that they increase compliance with existing rules, for example by improving the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The EU should refrain from proposing any new legislation when better or more coordinated implementation of existing rules and regulations would be more efficient.
Vízgazdálkodás
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 29/03/2017
Hivatkozás:
REX/482-EESC-2017Referral:
JOIN(2016) 49 final Rapporteur:
Jan SIMONS (Netherlands)
Downloads:
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 16/03/2016
Hivatkozás:
TEN/586-EESC-2016Referral:
COM(2015) 667 final 2015/0313 CODRapporteur:
Jan SIMONS (Netherlands)
The EESC welcomes the Commission's proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), as it fits in with general efforts to monitor the EU's external maritime borders much more effectively than in the past. However, it would once again stress that time is of the essence in implementing the proposed measures.
The Committee welcomes the proposal to expand the activities of EMSA; however, it has serious doubts as to whether EMSA has the human and financial resources to perform these additional activities properly.
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 15/10/2014
Hivatkozás:
NAT/644-EESC-2014-02361-00-00-ac-traReferral:
COM(2014) 177 finalRapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
501 -
Oct 15, 2014 Oct 16, 2014
Adopted at the plenary session of 15-16.10.2014
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 10/07/2013
Hivatkozás:
NAT/593-EESC-2013-534Referral:
COM(2012) 673 finalRapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
491 -
Jul 10, 2013 Jul 11, 2013
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 13/12/2012
Hivatkozás:
NAT/564-EESC-2012-1850Referral:
COM(2012) 216 finalRapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
485 -
Dec 12, 2012 Dec 13, 2012
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 23/05/2012
Hivatkozás:
NAT/550-EESC-2012-1307Referral:
COM(2011) 876 final – 2011/0429 (COD)Rapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
481 -
May 23, 2012 May 24, 2012
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 26/10/2011
Hivatkozás:
NAT/519-EESC-2011-1605Referral:
COM(2011) 385 final – 2011/0170 (NLE)Rapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
475 -
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 27, 2011
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 16/06/2011
Hivatkozás:
NAT/495-EESC-2011-1002Rapporteur:
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 16/06/2011
Hivatkozás:
NAT/495-EESC-2011-1002Rapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
472 -
Jun 15, 2011 Jun 16, 2011
Opinion
Elfogadott vélemények on 13/05/2009
Hivatkozás:
TEN/365-EESC-2009-868Rapporteur:
Plenáris ülés:
453 -
May 13, 2009 May 14, 2009