Põllumajandus

This page is also available in

Displaying 1 - 10 of 64

Pages

Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment

Opinion
Koostatavad arvamused (updated on 02/12/2020)
Viide: 
NAT/807-EESC-2020
Referral: 
COM(2020) 667 final COM(2020) 667 final
Rapporteur: 
Maria NIKOLOPOULOU (Workers - GR II / Spain)
Co-rapporteur: 
John COMER (Diversity Europe - GR III/Ireland)
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
559 -
Mar 24, 2021 Mar 25, 2021

The EU chemicals strategy aims to address the cumulative and combined effects of chemicals, including pesticides, stressing a need to accelerate work on methodologies that ensure existing provisions can be fully implemented.

The strategy is intended as a first step towards a zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment, as announced in the European Green Deal. 

Teabekiri: Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment

Recovery plan for Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 15/07/2020
Viide: 
ECO/523-EESC-2020-02886-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
COM(2020) 441 final 2020/0111 NLECOM(2020) 442 final COM(2020) 442 final COM(2020) 443 final 2018/0166 APPCOM(2020) 443 final 2018/0166 APPCOM(2020) 445 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2020) 446 final 2020/0109 APPCOM(2020) 446 final 2020/0109 APPCOM(2020) 456 final COM(2020) 459 final 2018/0224 COD
Rapporteur: 
Petru Sorin DANDEA (Workers - GR II/Romania), Tommaso DI FAZIO (/Italy), Petr ZAHRADNÍK (/Czech Republic) (Workers - GR II / Romania)
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
553 - Jul 16, 2020

The EESC strongly supports the Commission's proposal – Next Generation EU – as a specific tool for a quick and effective recovery.

The EESC takes a very positive view of the Commission's two main decisions:

  1. to introduce an extraordinary financial recovery instrument as part of the multiannual financial framework
  2. to raise common debt, which will be repaid over a long period of time, and prevent the extraordinary financial burden from falling directly on the Member States in the short run.

The EESC strongly welcomes the fact that the newly proposed instrument should be closely coordinated with the European Semester process, and furthermore welcomes the Commission's proposal to introduce additional genuine own resources based on different taxes (revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System, digital taxation, large companies' revenues).

EMSK arvamus: Recovery plan for Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027

European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in the year 2021

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 05/05/2020
Viide: 
NAT/780-EESC-2019
Referral: 
COM(2019) 581 final 2019/0254 CODCOM(2019) 581 final 2019/0254 COD
Rapporteur: 
Arnold PUECH d'ALISSAC (Employers - GR I / France)
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
Ses -
May 05, 2020 May 07, 2020

The new CAP comes with significant changes. Transitional rules are needed to ensure a smooth transition from the current to the next CAP period.

EMSK arvamus: European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in the year 2021

Downloads: 

European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in the year 2021

Action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 12/12/2018
Viide: 
INT/873-EESC-2018-04953-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
COM(2018) 365 final 2018/0189 COD
Rapporteur: 
Arnold PUECH d'ALISSAC (Employers - GR I / France)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

EMSK arvamus: Action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

Recast of Regulation 850/2004 on persistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 11/07/2018
Viide: 
NAT/719-EESC-2018-1688
Referral: 
COM(2018) 144 final 2018/0070 CODCOM(2018) 144 final 2018/0070 COD
Rapporteur: 
Brian CURTIS (United Kingdom)

Persistent organic pollutants ("POPs") are chemical substances that persist in the environment, bioaccumulate through the food web, and pose a risk to human health and the environment.

The aim of this proposal for a regulation is that the Commission has identified needs to update and recast the existing regulation on Persistent Organic Pollutants that dates back to 2004.

EMSK arvamus: Recast of Regulation 850/2004 on persistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (communication)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 06/12/2017
Viide: 
NAT/717-EESC-2017-03013-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
COM(2017) 198 final
Rapporteur: 
Lutz RIBBE (Diversity Europe - GR III / Germany)

This EESC opinion intends to look deeper into the merits and the consequences of the Commission's Action Plan for nature, people and the economy.

The Commission has developed an action plan to improve the implementation of the Nature Directives, their coherence with socio-economic objectives and engagement with national, regional and local authorities, stakeholders and citizens.

 

 

EMSK arvamus: Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (communication)

Pages

Displaying 1 - 10 of 64