Maaelu areng

This page is also available in

Displaying 11 - 20 of 44

Pages

An integrated approach for the EU's rural areas, with particular emphasis on vulnerable regions (own-initiative opinion)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 18/09/2020
Viide: 
NAT/790-EESC-2020
Rapporteur: 
Josep PUXEU ROCAMORA (Employers - GR I / Spain)
Co-rapporteur: 
Dilyana SLAVOVA (Bulgaria)

The EESC, through its consultation and platform can offer an expert, objective view that identifies key priorities for future rural policy, thereby considering in particular the needs of the vulnerable regions. Rural-proofing needs to be reinvigorated alongside specific rural policies while transgenerational and smart community measures need to be mainstreamed.

EMSK arvamus: An integrated approach for the EU's rural areas, with particular emphasis on vulnerable regions (own-initiative opinion)

Recovery plan for Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 15/07/2020
Viide: 
ECO/523-EESC-2020-02886-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
COM(2020) 441 final 2020/0111 NLECOM(2020) 442 final COM(2020) 442 final COM(2020) 443 final 2018/0166 APPCOM(2020) 443 final 2018/0166 APPCOM(2020) 445 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2020) 446 final 2020/0109 APPCOM(2020) 446 final 2020/0109 APPCOM(2020) 456 final COM(2020) 459 final 2018/0224 COD
Rapporteur: 
Petru Sorin DANDEA (Workers - GR II/Romania), Tommaso DI FAZIO (/Italy), Petr ZAHRADNÍK (/Czech Republic) (Workers - GR II / Romania)

The EESC strongly supports the Commission's proposal – Next Generation EU – as a specific tool for a quick and effective recovery.

The EESC takes a very positive view of the Commission's two main decisions:

  1. to introduce an extraordinary financial recovery instrument as part of the multiannual financial framework
  2. to raise common debt, which will be repaid over a long period of time, and prevent the extraordinary financial burden from falling directly on the Member States in the short run.

The EESC strongly welcomes the fact that the newly proposed instrument should be closely coordinated with the European Semester process, and furthermore welcomes the Commission's proposal to introduce additional genuine own resources based on different taxes (revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System, digital taxation, large companies' revenues).

EMSK arvamus: Recovery plan for Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027

Action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 12/12/2018
Viide: 
INT/873-EESC-2018-04953-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
COM(2018) 365 final 2018/0189 COD
Rapporteur: 
Arnold PUECH d'ALISSAC (Employers - GR I / France)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

EMSK arvamus: Action of the Union following its accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications

The contribution of Europe’s Rural Areas to the 2018 Year of Cultural Heritage ensuring sustainability and urban/rural cohesion (own-initiative opinion)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 19/09/2018
Viide: 
NAT/738-EESC-2018-01641
Rapporteur: 
Tom JONES (United Kingdom)

The European Year of Cultural Heritage is an excellent opportunity to understand how Europe’s rural cultural heritage is a prized asset which needs to be showcased alongside our urban heritage. The EESC opinion on the "Contribution of Europe’s Rural Areas to the 2018 Year of Cultural Heritage" will consider what measures are necessary to ensure sustainability of landscapes, habitats, species and human imprints. It will look at how to ensure initiatives that will add today's creativity to our heritage and improve co-operation between the rural and the urban, not least through promoting rural cultural tourism.

EMSK arvamus: The contribution of Europe’s Rural Areas to the 2018 Year of Cultural Heritage ensuring sustainability and urban/rural cohesion (own-initiative opinion)

Renewed partnership with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (Communication)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 07/12/2017
Viide: 
REX/485-EESC-2017-EESC-2017-00788-00-00-AC-TRA
Referral: 
JOIN(2016) 52 final
Rapporteur: 
Brenda KING (United Kingdom)

The Commission recently published a Communication on a Renewed Partnership with the ACP Group of countries. ACP-EU relations are currently governed by the Cotonou Partnership Agreement that will expire in 2020, therefore the Commission has published recommendations on what the future structure should be. Last year the EESC already drafted a general opinion on the post-Cotonou framework; this new opinion will have to answer specifically to the Commission's communication.

 

EMSK arvamus: Renewed partnership with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (Communication)

Downloads: 

Renewed ACP Partnership

Villages and small towns as catalysts for rural development – challenges and opportunities (own-initiative opinion)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 18/10/2017
Viide: 
NAT/698-EESC-2016-06759
Rapporteur: 
Tom JONES (United Kingdom)

This opinion considers the root causes, the negative impact on rural areas and highlights best initiatives to re-energise communities through the RDP and other support measures.

EMSK arvamus: Villages and small towns as catalysts for rural development – challenges and opportunities (own-initiative opinion)

From Cork 2.0 Declaration to concrete actions (own-initiative opinion)

Opinion
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 05/07/2017
Viide: 
NAT/709-EESC-2017
Rapporteur: 
Sofia BJÖRNSSON (Sweden)

Rural development is a horizontal issue that affects practically all policy areas.

The EESC welcomes the Cork 2.0 Declaration that offers strong ongoing support for a rural policy at EU level. The EESC sees itself as a natural partner when it comes to implementing the declaration, and requests that the Commission continue producing progress reports on said implementation.

Rural regions in the EU are not homogeneous and situations vary between and within Member States. These differences mean there is a need for focus and a strategic approach when using available EU funds. This must be based most importantly on initiatives from those living in rural areas.

EMSK arvamus: From Cork 2.0 Declaration to concrete actions (own-initiative opinion)

Pages

Displaying 11 - 20 of 44