COVID-19: Amendments to the CPR, ERDF and Cohesion Fund - Related Opinions

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

RSS

The future of cohesion policy (Exploratory opinion at the request of the Romanian Presidency)

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 20/03/2019
Viide: 
ECO/484-EESC-2019
Rapporteur: 
Stefano MALLIA (Employers - GR I / Malta)
Co-rapporteur: 
Ioannis VARDAKASTANIS (Diversity Europe - GR III/Greece)

The objective of this proposal is to provide an update of EESC's positions related to the cohesion package presented by the Commission on May 2018. While the discussions in the Council and the Parliament are still ongoing, this opinion will reflect better the developments in view of a successful cohesion policy in the post-2020 period.

The Romanian presidency who has asked for this opinion proposes that  the conclusions drawn in this opinion could stimulate the informal ministerial debate of the cohesion ministers to be held in April 2019.

EMSK arvamus: The future of cohesion policy (Exploratory opinion at the request of the Romanian Presidency)

Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 17/10/2018
Viide: 
ECO/462-EESC-2018-03269
Referral: 
COM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 CODCOM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 CODCOM(2018) 372 final 2018/0197 COD
Rapporteur: 
Ioannis VARDAKASTANIS (Diversity Europe - GR III / Greece)
Co-rapporteur: 
Ester VITALE (Italy)

The EESC considers the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF) as pivotal factors to achieve sustainable development in the EU and therefore strongly regrets the cut of 12% in the ERDF and 46% in the CF.

 

EMSK arvamus: Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund

Common Provisions Regulation 2021-2027

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 17/10/2018
Viide: 
ECO/461-EESC-2018-02791
Referral: 
COM(2018) 375 final 2018/0196 CODCOM(2018) 375 final 2018/0196 COD
Rapporteur: 
Stefano MALLIA (Employers - GR I / Malta)

The EESC strongly rejects the Commission's proposal to cut the EU's budget by 10% in real terms and urges the Member States (MS) to find solutions that allow this budget to be kept at the same level as the 2014-2020 programming period.

EMSK arvamus: Common Provisions Regulation 2021-2027

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3