Adopted on 05/05/2020
Reference:
NAT/783-EESC-01726-00-01-pac-TRAReferral:
COM(2020) 142 final 2020/0059 CODGeneral Rapporteur:
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund - Related Opinions
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
Adopted on 20/03/2020
Reference:
ECO/515-EESC-2020-01536-00-01-PAC-TRA Referral:
COM(2020) 113 final 2020/0043 CODGeneral Rapporteur:
Bernd SCHLÜTER (Diversity Europe - GR III)
Downloads:
Adopted on 02/03/2020
Reference:
ECO/516-EESC-2020-01535-00-01-pac-traReferral:
COM(2020) 114 final 2020/0044 CODGeneral Rapporteur:
Stefano PALMIERI (Workers - GR II)
Adopted on 30/10/2019
Reference:
NAT/770-EESC-2019-01573Rapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Henri MALOSSE (France)
Adopted on 19/09/2018
Reference:
ECO/460-EESC-2018-02072-00-00Referral:
COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 321 final COM(2018) 322 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 322 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 325 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2018) 325 final 2018/0135 CNSCOM(2018) 326 final 2018/0131 NLECOM(2018) 327 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 327 final 2018/0132 APPCOM(2018) 328 final 2018/0133 NLERapporteur:
Europeans need more (and better) Europe. The powers and financial resources currently allocated to the EU have been increasingly misaligned with the concerns and expectations of Europeans. The EESC, in accordance with the European Parliament's position, therefore proposes that the expenditure and revenue figure reach 1.3% of GNI. The proposed level of commitments of 1.11% of the EU's GNI is too modest to credibly deliver on the political agenda of the EU.
The EESC recognises the high European added value of the programmes where the MFF 2021-2027 concentrates the main increases in expenditure. However, the Committee questions the fact that these increases are made at the cost of strong cuts in cohesion policy (-10%) and the Common Agricultural Policy – CAP (-15%).
Adopted on 11/07/2012
Reference:
NAT/549-EESC-2012-1594Referral:
COM(2011) 804 final – 2011/0380 (COD)Rapporteur:
Plenary session:
482 -
Jul 11, 2012 Jul 12, 2012
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7